Mississippi Law TV® is part of the Law TV® Network, a video driven legal directory that features quality educational videos from some of the state’s premier law firms.
The legal directory includes a comprehensive listing for each law firm, including how to reach the firm directly or on social media.
The complaint alleges the defendants are intentionally infringing on Subway's trademarks and operating their Sub Sub restaurant using Subway's...
Continue Reading
U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs of the District of Massachusetts entered a default judgment in favor of Jumpsource, partially granting their...
Continue Reading
Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery wrote in January that Tesla CEO Elon Musk "wields unusually expansive managerial...
Continue Reading
Cozen O'Connor is moving into Little Rock with the hire of a former Arkansas attorney general, while Faegre Drinker's hire arrives from Troutman...
Continue Reading
"This new clemency initiative is a cornerstone of our administration's efforts to make New Jersey the state of second chances," Gov. Phil Murphy said...
Continue Reading
Amazon cited a growing trend among attorneys to corner niche markets by suing specific corporations by gleaning inside knowledge through expansive...
Continue Reading
To secure a conviction, prosecutors must prove that Trump caused his company’s business records to be falsified to conceal another crime specifically the use of unlawful means to influence the 2016 presidential election.
The judge ordered unredacted versions of his opinion go to the chief disciplinary counsel for the New York and California state bars, “in light of the indefensible conduct” of the attorneys involved in the Samsung patent case.
The court concluded that while the district court didn’t err in dismissing the lawsuit over plaintiffs’ nonappearance, as they believed they were to appear by telephone, the dismissal was too drastic given the circumstances.
“The (prejudgment remedy) is what triggered the conversation for us to be able to get the defendant to pay something above and beyond the $1 million policy, because all other avenues were leading back to the $1 million policy itself,” plaintiffs counsel Christopher Cramer said.