Mississippi Law TV® is part of the Law TV® Network, a video driven legal directory that features quality educational videos from some of the state’s premier law firms.
The legal directory includes a comprehensive listing for each law firm, including how to reach the firm directly or on social media.
The complaint alleges the defendants are intentionally infringing on Subway's trademarks and operating their Sub Sub restaurant using Subway's...
Continue Reading
U.S. District Judge Allison D. Burroughs of the District of Massachusetts entered a default judgment in favor of Jumpsource, partially granting their...
Continue Reading
Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery wrote in January that Tesla CEO Elon Musk "wields unusually expansive managerial...
Continue Reading
Cozen O'Connor is moving into Little Rock with the hire of a former Arkansas attorney general, while Faegre Drinker's hire arrives from Troutman...
Continue Reading
"This new clemency initiative is a cornerstone of our administration's efforts to make New Jersey the state of second chances," Gov. Phil Murphy said...
Continue Reading
Amazon cited a growing trend among attorneys to corner niche markets by suing specific corporations by gleaning inside knowledge through expansive...
Continue Reading
U.S. District Chief Judge Danny C. Reeves of the Eastern District of Kentucky issued the 93-page opinion Monday in the matter of State of Tennessee v. Cardona, holding that the department redefining “sex” to include gender identity wreaks havoc on Title IX and produces results that Congress could not have intended.
SHEIN, an online retailer of discounted goods, sued various defendants associated with Temu, accusing the Chinese e-commerce platform of using the plaintiff’s photographs of apparel to sell it owns products.
“Changes in the merger review process has undoubtedly increased the cost and resource burden on merging parties,” write Elizabeth Suarez, Kaylynn Moss and Terry Calvani.
The case law makes clear that the cook’s conduct need not be solely or even predominantly motivated by a purpose to serve the employer, the court said.